I received the following feedback from an acquaintance regarding the column I posted last month. 

"I simply cannot come to terms with the phrase 'I will put enmity' (Genesis 3:15) spoken by God in Genesis. God punished human sin—symbolised by Adam and Eve's failure to keep their promise—with the words 'I will put enmity' for all eternity. The phrase 'put enmity' is a very harsh one. Although the essential nature of humanity was sternly admonished by God with His words, 'I will put enmity,' I want to believe that we are forgiven through Jesus." 

I think there was a slight misunderstanding here, likely because I did not make enough effort to convey my thoughts clearly. Therefore, I would like to delve a little deeper into the content of my previous post and share my idea. 

This was when I looked to Genesis to find the reason why the world had not acknowledged the Word and the people had not accepted it (cf. John 1:10–11). On this occasion, as in the post before last, I interpreted the "serpent" in Genesis as the "human information" that manifested between the first woman and man. As we considered last time, because Adam interpreted the "human information" he shared with the "woman" differently from her, he already harboured "enmity towards God" when he stood before God after eating from the "tree of the knowledge of good and evil." This "enmity towards God" held by Adam was passed down from him to all his descendants. However, since Adam's descendants are also the descendants of the "woman," the divine word "I will set enmity" was likewise passed down to all descendants. 

Here, two forms of "enmity" were inherited: the "enmity towards God" harboured by humankind, and the divine word "I will put enmity" placed by God between humankind and "human information." 

The problem lies in the fact that the "enmity towards God" held by humans evolves. The divine word "I will put enmity" functions to enable humans to distinguish ‘human information’ from God and to maintain their relationship with Him; therefore, unless God Himself changes it, it possesses a permanence that continues to operate unaltered. However, the enmity towards God held by humans changes as human knowledge evolves. Moreover, it evolves rapidly compared to other living creatures. I would like to consider this situation. 

When God resolved to "create humankind," He formed man of dust from the ground; hence, it is said that man was called Adam ("man of ground"). Although it is not explicitly stated and therefore somewhat unclear, the man and woman described in Genesis Chapter 1 appear to be written in Hebrew with the nuance of male and female. It is written that God resolved to create humankind in His image, as beings bearing similarities to Him; however, first He created man's physical body in His own image. 

So, what of the other aspect of this likeness—that is, the similarities? This is described in detail in Genesis Chapter 2. 

At the beginning of Chapter 2, it is written that God completed all creation, finished all His work, rested, and sanctified that day. Jesus said, "But the hour is coming, and now is, when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth, for such the Father seeks to worship him. God is spirit, and those who worship him must worship in spirit and truth" (John 4:23–24). Judging from these words, I believe that God created humankind with the plan that "humankind should subdue the earth, rule over every living creature, and worship God through all creation." Man was created for the day God had sanctified. 

For this reason, God formed man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life. Genesis claims that man thus became a living being, bearing witness to the fact that God bestowed upon man a likeness to Himself. 

Later, God told Adam, "In the sweat of your face you shall eat bread till you return to the ground, for out of it you were taken; you are dust, and to dust you shall return" (Genesis 3:19). The phrases "out of it you were taken" and "you are dust" in these words precisely describe a person composed of both body and spirit. Does this mean that we face two kinds of death? 

Thank you for reading this far. If I were to continue here, it would become rather lengthy, so I shall continue in the next post. I would be grateful if you would reflect on this with me. Thank you for your support. 

(This article is the one I contributed to a Japanese Internet magazine, Catholic AI.)

Maria K. M.